Exploring Adoption
(Adapted from CBS News)
Adopting a child can be one of the most rewarding
and fulfilling things people can do. Whether they adopt because they can't have children of their own, or because they want
to give a child a good home, most adoptive parents are eternally thankful for the opportunity. Each year, 127,000 children
are adopted in the U.S., according to the National Adoption Information Clearinghouse. Adoptions can be formal or informal.
"Formal adoption," says the clearinghouse, "occurs when a legal recognition of a parental relationship is made. Informal adoption
is "when the birth mother allows another person (or persons), usually another family member, to take parental responsibility
for her child without obtaining legal approval or recognition of that arrangement." Most adoptive parents, the organization
adds, are 31 to 40 and members of two parent families, but a growing number are 41 to 49, the organization adds. Referring
to the interviews, background checks, paperwork and bureaucratic process involved with adopting a child, the first tip for
prospective adoptive parents is to persevere, be patient and do their homework. Any difficulties and stress or strains that
you have been through will disappear with the first hug," Thomas Atwood, president of the National Council for Adoption, an
adoption research, education and advocacy organization. (http://www.ncfa-usa.org/) "I am an adoptive father and I can vouch for what every adoptive parent says, which is they can not
possibly love that child more if it was a biological child of theirs," says Atwood, who adopted his son, who is now 13, when
he was less than a month old. "The reasons why people adopt vary," Atwood explains, "but the most common reason is to love
and parent a child. The other is compassion -- to give a better life to a child in need. The compassion aspect enters into
foster care."
Different Types of Adoption
There are three types of adoption: infant,
foster and international.
Infant
The domestic infant
adoption has the reputation of being difficult. "Maybe it isn't as difficult as you think," Atwood suggests. "You really need
you to do your homework. Maybe it isn't as difficult as you hear." People who want to adopt a child can go through an adoption
agency or an attorney. Atwoods says the person or agency you consult will tell you if your profile is one that a birth parent
will be interested in. Birth parents are very involved today, he notes. They will pick the parent with counseling based on
age, income, length of marriage, stability of marriage, siblings and pictures of the home. The attorney or agency will also
tell you how long you may have to wait.
Foster care
These children are usually older (on average
8 or 9 years old). Infants are rarely available through the foster system because they don't usually get removed from their
families that quickly and there is a bureaucracy to go through, which takes time. There is a process that foster children
need to go through before they are available for adoption. Parental rights need to be terminated. Sometimes the government
can move very slowly. "The typical way to adopt here is to be a foster parent of the child, with the hope and plan to adopt,"
Atwood notes. "But there is some uncertainty. The foster child may be reunited with the birth parents and the foster parents
may never see him or her again." To those who are concerned about adopting children who are in foster care, Atwood says, "Most
children who are adopted out of foster care do just great and make the transition well. Many of them have been through a lot
and maybe lived in several foster care places. They have been removed because of neglect, abuse or abandonment, but it's not
something that love and wisdom can't overcome." He encourages people to think of adopting foster kids.
International
Roughly one
in six adoptions in the U.S. each year involve children from other nations. "Some couples turn to international adoptions
because they know they will be able to adopt a young child, not always as young as an infant, but frequently between 9 and
18 months old," says Atwood. "One aspect that attracts many people is the relative certainty that they will be able to adopt."
They also can get a good idea how long they're going to have to wait to get a child. Parents who are concerned about how much
they would have to be involved with the birth parents if they adopt domestically, find less involvement with them a good reason
to adopt outside of the U.S. Also, an older couple may do so because they don't want to wait or they don't feel confident
in their ability to adopt an infant domestically. There are many more couples that want to adopt infants than there are available
infants in the U.S., Atwood points out. But abroad, it's the opposite. There are more children available for adoption than
there are people willing to adopt. However, he cautions, there can be surprises. For example, Romania allowed thousands of
children to be adopted in the past, but has now shut down adopting outside of their country. It's an issue of national pride.
"There are people who oppose international adoption, who think it's better for a child to be in a desperate situation and
an institution in their own country than to be adopted by loving parents," Atwood observes. Romania was told that if it did
not shut down the adoptions of Romanian children by foreigners, it wouldn't be allowed into the European Union, Atwood reports.
"They will couch this as protecting children from trafficking (stealing), which is rare and has been known to happen in developing
countries," he adds. The top countries where international adoptions occur include China, Russia, Guatemala, South Korea,
Kazakhstan and Ukraine.
Telling a child about being adopted
"Adoption is normal and healthy, so we
want to give that impression to our child from the beginning," Atwood says. "We talked to our son about it to him as a baby,
so we would be comfortable with the word 'adoption.' It's very rare nowadays for adoptive parents not to tell their children
they are adopted. Don't force it on them. Follow their lead and be honest and loving. They will get what they need in that
way." Atwood says adoptive parents should be respectful of birth parents and
appreciate what they have done. "What the mother has done is a loving act," he says. "She was a good mother in making that
decision. It wasn't abandonment. She couldn't give the loving stable family she wanted her child to have."
What
if years later, the child wants to seek their birth parents?
"This is as personal as it can possibly
be," he says. "Some children care a lot about who their birth parents are. Others don't, and then there are those children
who have feelings in between. "The bottom line, as I see it, is that, because of the diversity of personal views, we need
to have a policy based on mutual consent among all parties. Public policy should not enable one party of the adoption to force
themselves on another party of the adoption. There are ways of enabling adoptive children to connect with their birth parents
through a mutual consent registry where both contacts inform the government they would like to be in contact. Every state
has at least that and some states go further. A few states allow unconditional access to birth parent information. These states
are Oregon, New Hampshire, Alaska, Kansas and Alabama.
Costs
Infant adoptions
in the U.S. can cost from $10,000 to $35,000. The most typical costs run $15,000 to $25,000. Some adoption agencies have sliding
scales based on the income of the adoptive parents. International adoptions are $15,000 to 40,000. Average costs, including
travel expenses, range from $18,000 to $28,000. Some countries require that both parents fly to the country where the child
is from. Sometimes more than one trip to a foreign country is also necessary. "Adoption agencies are almost universally involved
in the social services of serving children and families," Atwood notes. "Although the fees can sound high, adoption agencies
don't make a lot of money. They have services to cover, such as salaries and expenses. These are social workers, who don't
make a lot of money. The cost to adopt through foster care is essentially $10,000, which the adoptive parent can consider
free because the government subsidizes the adoption by paying the fees. If a foster child with special needs is being adopted,
there will be additional expenses, which the government may subsidize as well. Atwood says it's important to check out the
adoption agency and look at several. "There is a state licensing authority that can tell (prospective adoptive parents) if
there have been any complaints. Call the Department of Social Services at the state level. The most important tip in selecting
an agency is references. You want to look around and get references from other adoption parents. Look at several agencies.
No wishful thinking allowed. People get all excited about adopting and they are full of love and it's easy for that to overcome
common logical thinking. Ask questions. Don't base decisions on wishful thinking." Atwood calls attention to the "at risk
placement" that is often done these days. This is when a child is placed with a family before the revocation period isn't
over and the birth mother still can change her mind. "When you work with the birth mother beforehand, you have to be prepared
that she can change her mind, even after she places it with you," he says. "Typically, the birth mother has less than 30 days
to change her mind. When we adopted our son, it was more common that the agency would not place the child until the revocation
period was over."
*Some parents who are considering adoption
are concerned that the child may be addicted to drugs because of the birth mother. Atwood says the adoption agency that is
supervising the adoption gets as much information as available and delivers it to the adoptive parents. He says, "Adoptive
parents should ask those questions and be as realistic as they can be and ask themselves, 'Am I called to do this? Can I handle
a child who may have inherited a drug-related problem?' It's really up to them. People shouldn't feel obligated to take on
that challenge if they don't feel they can handle it."
‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ
There are, however, several important psychological issues that arise after an
adoption. Child psychologist Robin Goodman discusses a few of the ones parents must think about.
When to tell your child he or she was adopted
"No matter what the circumstances, there's
always the pink elephant of when to tell and what to tell," Goodman says. "In general, the feeling is the sooner you tell
your child, the better, but what happens is -- it's sort of the way parents get nuts about the sex talk with their kids --
adoptive parents feel the same sort of anxiety when they tell their child that he or she was adopted."
Here are a few ways to start the adoption
dialogue with your child:
"Use the word adoption earlier on in their
lives," Goodman advises. "If you don't talk about it, they'll feel that something is wrong. And if you don't start the dialogue
early on, if you postpone it until they're older, they could resent you, and they could jump to other conclusions and accusations,
such as, 'Well, what else did you lie to me about?'" However, it's not necessary to bring up the topic when the child is too
young. "A preschooler doesn't necessarily understand things as complex as this. So tell your pre-schooler something like,
'You grew inside one lady and we made you our own baby when you came outside to grow up.' A young child may just need to hear
he or she was born like everyone else (inside), and is not really asking those complex questions just yet. But when kids ask
more questions about where babies come from, it will be a cue to add more to the discussion, Goodman suggests. Adoption today
is not the same as adoption 20 years ago. "There are so many definitions of 'a family' these days," she says. "There are kids
with four daddies, or five mommies. Adoption is not viewed as this strange, isolating thing anymore because there are so many
atypical family situations today." And she stresses that even if it is not physically obvious to your child that he or she
is adopted (as it is with children adopted from a different race), you still need to have the conversation early on.
How
to have the conversation with your child
"It's a question of understanding and
language," says Goodman. "If you use it in normal conversation early on, and you teach a young child what adoption means,
it's an easier transition." A question your adoptive child may ask is: "Why didn't my mommy want me?" The way to answer it
depends on the age of the child, Goodman says. "You can say, 'I'm the mommy that wanted you and loves you.' Or tell him or
her: 'Mommies do different things when they have babies.' Explain the difference between having babies and loving babies."
As they get older, your answer to that question depends on what you know about the birth parents. But, Goodman points out,
even though adoptive parents should not give their child false information, they should not offer all the information, if
that information is harmful for the child. For example, it's probably best not to give a child all the gory details about
their birth mother's drug and alcohol abuse. Goodman also recommends using some of the numerous children's books about adoption
to start the adoption conversation. "If a child sees a character in a book, and you talk about the fact that the character
was adopted by a loving family, and you tell your child: 'So were you,' he or she will be able to relate. It won't be a question
of: 'Oh, I'm so different from everyone else.' It'll be more like, 'Oh, OK, cool!'" And, she warns, "Don't be overly analytical
of your child's response to the news that they're adopted. A lot of times, a kid just looks at parents and says, 'Alright,
I get it.' And it's true. They're not covering; they're not trying to put on a brave face. If they say they're alright with
it, chances are, they are OK." Goodman also says it's important to reassure adopted children that they didn't do anything
"wrong" that caused them to be adopted.
Looking for the birth parents
As children get older, and they consider
their own sense of self and their place in the world, they may want to know more and more about their birth parents, perhaps
even going so far as to seek out their birth mother or father. "When kids are questioning who their birth parents are, it's
important to realize that they're not rejecting the adoptive parents, but they simply want more information on themselves"
Goodman says. "Adoptive parents should anticipate children wanting more information about their birth parents. Human nature
makes you curious: do you look like your father? Do you act like your aunt, etc. Parents shouldn't look at it as a criticism;
rather, it's a quest for self-understanding." Goodman says if the child is old enough to decide to find his or her birth
parents, there really is no reason for adoptive parents to get in the way: "Today, there are lots of adoptions: open adoptions
where the birth parents are a part of the child's life, or the adoptive parents keep in contact with the birth parents in
case the situation arises when their child wants to meet the birth parents." She also says, "Some kids who are struggling
or have lots of questions may find comfort by talking to other adopted kids to get support and comfort. They can talk about
their feelings about finding the person who gave birth to them with people experiencing the same feelings, and that often
can be very helpful to a child."
When the child remembers the birth
parents
In those cases in which the adopted child
remembers the birth parents, Goodman recommends reassuring the child by pointing out that the birth parent or someone close
wanted the best for the child, and that is why he or she was given up for adoption. Goodman notes, "Invariably, older adopted
children will have to deal with more issues than those adopted at infancy. They'll have memories of a birth parent, and often
these kids will still have an allegiance to that parent, which makes it a more challenging situation for adoptive parents.
But this is not an insurmountable problem; with patience and love and understanding, these adoptive situations can work out
beautifully." She adds that it is possible to get two variations on a theme when adopting an older child. "You could get a
child who's just really thankful to be with a loving family," she says. "You could also get a child who is so thankful to
be with a loving family that will turn out to be the perfectionist child. Such children will want everything to be absolutely
perfect so that they won't be left again, or passed on to someone else. They just want to stay with you and will do everything
in their power to make you happy. "The opposite, of course, is possible too, with the potential of adopting a child who is
so hurt and angry with the birth parents, and so distrustful of anyone in a parental position, that he or she will lash out
at you and just want to be bad. The two can look very different, but they actually come from the same place. It's this idea
of not wanting to be passed on again, not wanting to be abandoned," Goodman explains.
*Considering the biological
background
Today, with so many foreign adoptions,
Goodman points out that it's also important to acknowledge an adopted child's biological background. "Children's history is
their history forever," she says. "You can't erase it; it is eternally part of who they are. If you adopt a child from China,
you may want to send him or her to a Chinese school to learn his or her native language. Or you may want to create a life
history book, sort of like a baby book that shows the orphanage where you adopted them in their hometown in Russia, and a
description of the town - whatever information about their past they may want to connect with at some point. Don't pretend
it's not a part of who they are, because that will only breed resentment in the future."
‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒ
It used to be that when a man or woman reached
a certain age and they weren't married, they accepted that they wouldn't have children. But that's changing. Today, more and
more singles are adopting by themselves -- and not just women.
One such single adoptive parent, is Ken Regan,
a principal for 25 years who had worked with children for most of his life, but had never had one of his own. "I decided that
it's time to focus in and have one on my own. To have a child and be a full part of a child's life, not just the school hours
of nine and four. I wanted to be part of a child. And I wanted a child to be part of me." So, Ken adopted, by himself. And
now, at the end of each workday, he leaves his school and goes to another -- to meet his son, Michael. What was the turning
point that led Ken, in his 50s, to adopt? "I guess, I don't want to say it was the clock, but I was looking at everybody else
and saying, 'They have.' And I was career oriented and then moving ahead. And I just said "I'm ready." “I wanted this
challenge." And being a single parent certainly has its challenges. "We'll be in a store and he'd run up the escalator. And
the person at the top of the escalator would say, 'Where is your mother?' And he goes, 'I don't have one.' That kind of thing."
Ken adopted Michael from China three years ago, becoming part of a growing trend in which more and more singles seek to become
parents through international adoption.
“Certainly, it's changed a lot from
the early 80s, when only two countries were allowing single people to adopt," says Lee Varon, who adopted her son, Jose, from
El Salvador twenty years ago. A decade later, she adopted daughter Julia from Russia. Her parenting experiences and background
as a family counselor led Varon to write "Adopting on Your Own." "It's not just like adding another activity onto your busy
schedule. It changes your relationships with your friends, with your family, with how you interact with your community." And
Varon stresses that close relationships with friends and family are the keys to successfully adopting as a single. "With couples,
they do have that built-in other adult to sort of negotiate things with, talk things over with. Single people really need
to create that for themselves."
"Having a support network was the most crucial
thing for me. You can't do it 24 hours," reflects Michelle Savage who, at 42, adopted daughter Maddie from Russia last year.
Savage developed a support group back home, which included friends who have also recently adopted. But, while friendships
are important, they're not the same as having a two-parent family. Asked if she ever feels guilty that Maddie doesn't have
a father, Savage replied, "I wouldn't say I feel guilty, because it's not my fault. But I think it will get more difficult
as she gets older, the fact that she doesn't have a father. …I would love to get married and have a father for Maddie,
and I've dated since the adoption, so I don't think it's impossible." Even if
Savage doesn't get married, she believes raising Maddie as a single parent beats Maddie being left alone in a Russian orphanage,
and that both of their lives have improved since they met. "She's so much fun to come home to," Savage says. "And you know,
she makes my life so different and exciting."
Ken Regan can relate. "The thing that makes
a family is love," he observes. "And that we have. We love each other and that makes a family."
And families with single adoptive parents
are proving to be successful. The Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute (http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/) studies adoption issues, and finds that children adopted from foster care are often better off with
a single parent, because of the focused nurturing some of these children really need.
The most important consideration for single people
considering adopting to keep in mind is to do the emotional work. They need to have already gone through a grieving period,
if you will, of realizing they are not going to have a child in the traditional way. And then they need to make sure they're
adopting the child because they want to be a parent, and not to fill an empty hole in their lives. As for finances, since
there won't be anybody else to lean on, it's important for a single parent to not only be financially secure, but to have
a child-friendly work environment. For example, does your employer offer flextime and make allowances when issues with child
care come up? Because they always will.
TASK: From the four texts below, collect pros and cons regarding
stem cell research and write an argumentative essay stating your opinion in this fiercely controversial debate. 
Embryonic stem cell therapy 'best route'
By Professor Harry Moore, Centre for Stem Cell Biology, University of
Sheffield
BBC News (bbc.co.uk) – December 15, 2004
ALTERNATIVE VIEW BELOW IN RED
TEXT ON UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD BELOW IN GOLD
Medical progress, by its nature, is never straightforward.
With any new treatment there are always risks and potential side effects.
But I believe the potential that stem cells offer to revolutionise the treatment of several degenerative diseases,
as well as spinal cord injury, definitely merits research.
The legislation in place in the UK for embryo research since 1990, and revised in 2001, is perhaps the most
advanced in the world and strictly governs what studies can be undertaken.
This is welcomed by the vast majority of doctors and scientists in the field and protects both patients and
researchers.
Of course the maverick scientist will always exist (and needs to be safeguarded against).
And stem cells are not the panacea for every disease (as might be thought from all the media hype).
But, given the progress made in the last few years, some stem cell therapies may well be readily available within
10 to 15 years.
The challenge is to develop effective and safe cell therapies - which will take time, money and perseverance.
Promise
Embryonic stem cells in the laboratory retain the ability to form specific cell types such as insulin-secreting
cells, nerves and heart cells.
If transplanted, these cells might halt and even cure patients of diseases such as Type 1 diabetes, Parkinson's
disease or heart failure.
Transplantation studies into animals with these cells have shown much promise.
This research represents an important change in our thinking on how, in the future, we might treat these debilitating
illnesses where patients require long-term care, and drugs cannot cure the condition.
Presently, a major stumbling block for cell transplantation is the lack of suitable tissue for donation.
For instance, trials to treat diabetes with pancreatic cells (which regulate blood glucose by secreting insulin)
from dead donors have shown good success.
This transplantation therapy controls diabetes much better than insulin injections alone, giving patients the
prospects of a much better quality of life.
But often cells from two or three donors are required to treat one patient.
This is not only very impractical but there are potential long-term risks of transmission of other blood-borne
diseases to the patient.
Because embryonic stem cells proliferate indefinitely they represent an inexhaustible supply of cells, which
can be cultured in quarantine conditions, free from the risk of other infectious agents.
Greatest potential
A question often asked is: why use human embryos and embryonic stem cells - would it not be more ethical to
use adult stem cells from bone marrow, babies' cord blood or other tissues?
In fact adult stem cells are used to treat certain conditions.
But I, and many other scientists, believe that only embryonic stem cells have the true capacity to develop into
all the different cell types of the body and therefore represent the greatest potential for future cell therapies.
Embryos are donated by couples undergoing IVF treatment after independent counselling, are surplus to their
clinical need and would often otherwise be destroyed.
These donors have confidence in the regulatory framework and inspections of the HFEA and are motivated into
giving embryos with the hope research will lead eventually to clinical applications.
Nevertheless, the potential of other stem cells should, and is, being explored.
Recent experiments suggest that adult stem cells may have some capacity to change into other cells for therapy.
In time, we may be able to reprogramme many cells to other functions in the body in which case early embryos
and embryonic stem cells may not be necessary. But, in the meantime, I believe the judicious
use of human embryos and the development of embryonic stem cell lines provides our best route for developing new therapies
to treat a range of devastating degenerative diseases. 
Embryonic stem cell therapy 'morally unacceptable'
By Josephine Quintavalle, Founder, Comment on Reproductive Ethics (CORE)
BBC News (bbc.co.uk) – December 15, 2004
An
estimated 56 diseases have been treated with the use of adult, human stem cells.
But
there are no recorded cases of treatment using stem cells derived from a human embryo.
Worldwide
a huge debate rages about the ethics of stem cell research.
One
side argues that no moral boundaries should be in place in this field beyond basic issues of safety.
Others,
including Comment on Reproductive Ethics (CORE), insist that science must always function within an ethical framework, even
if this may lead to prohibitions.
This
is not a war of absolutes, however. Both sides are in favour of stem cell therapy.
The
debate centres not around stem cells themselves, but about their provenance.
Where
stem cells are harvested from the embryo and foetus - as opposed to the umbilical cord blood or placenta of the newborn, or
the adult - existing life has to be sacrificed.
This
is a trade-off which CORE simply cannot accept.
We
believe we have a duty to protect human subjects from abuse, and this duty must inform all medical ethics.
Regardless
of potential benefit, we must reject outright any research which results in the deliberate destruction of human life.
Alternatives
A
blind woman's sight was restored this October, in the US, using stem cells. These particular cells had come not from an embryo
(up to eight weeks old) but from aborted foetal tissues.
We
believe that such cures should never depend on the killing of an unborn child.
Indeed,
some patients have had their sight restored through corneal transplants created from their own, adult, stem cells.
This
is the kind of stem cell therapy we welcome wholeheartedly and which makes up the 56 types of treatment highlighted in the
opening paragraph.
It
is "no" to embryo and foetal stem cells, but a huge vote of confidence in cord blood, placental and adult stem cells.
Some
scientists are prepared to accord the embryo and foetus some special status and would be happier to explore ethical alternatives
if these were indeed available.
But
others support their destruction regardless of the alternatives.
Ill informed
It
is, therefore, important to be scrupulously objective when weighing up the relevant scientific evidence.
There
is far too much inaccurate or inadequate information in circulation, particularly in relationship to the potential of embryonic
stem cells.
One
rarely hears of the dangers associated with this kind of cell: how they can run out of control, become unstoppable and form
tumours.
It
is sometimes claimed that the embryos used in this research will be simply "discards" from assisted fertility treatments.
In
fact, "quality" human embryos will sometimes be created deliberately for this research.
Moreover,
in order to avoid problems of tissue rejection in the sick patient, some embryos will be cloned - something that many people
object to very strongly.
With
the therapeutic reality of adult stem cells increasing by the week, it is very difficult to justify the unfettered enthusiasm
for embryo research which dominates UK science.
Even
if embryonic and foetal stem cells were to prove safe and effective in forthcoming decades, the fact remains that they can
only be harvested at the cost of destroying early human life. Such cures can never
be morally acceptable. 
Treating
Leukemia With Stem Cells
By
Janet McConnaughey
Nov.
24, 2004
(AP) Umbilical cord blood, now used mostly to treat children with
leukemia, could save thousands of adults with the disease each year who cannot find bone marrow donors, two big studies indicate.
A European study found that those who got cord blood were just as likely to be free of leukemia two years later as those
who got marrow. A U.S. study looking at three-year survival yielded results almost as promising. To Dr. Mary Horowitz
of the Medical College of Wisconsin, senior author of the U.S. study, the message is clear: Umbilical cord blood can save
adults. Leukemia patients often undergo radiation or chemotherapy to kill their cancerous white blood cells -- a treatment
that wipes out their immune systems, too. To restore their immune systems, doctors give these patients an infusion of bone
marrow or umbilical cord blood, both of which contain stem cells capable of developing into every kind of blood cell. Cord
blood offers an important advantage over marrow that makes it particularly valuable for use in transplants: Its stem cells
are less likely to attack the recipient's body. That allows a wider margin of error in matching up donors and recipients.
But up to now, cord blood has been considered suitable only for children, because each donation has only about one-tenth
the number of stem cells in a marrow donation. The two new studies, published in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine,
suggest that is not a serious impediment. In the European study, involving 682 patients, about one-third of both those
who got matched marrow and those who got cord blood that did not quite match their own tissues were alive after two years.
In the U.S. study of 601 patients, about one-third of those who got matched marrow were leukemia-free after two years, compared
with about one-fifth of those who got cord blood or unmatched marrow. Both studies were based on records from transplants
in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Using cord blood could improve the odds of getting a transplant for the 16,000 U.S.
adult leukemia patients each year who cannot find a compatible marrow donor, said the U.S. study's leader, Dr. Mary J. Laughlin
of Case Comprehensive Cancer Center in Cleveland. Still, Dr. Nancy Kernan, assistant chief of marrow transplantation at
Memorial-Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, said cord blood transplants in adults should be done only as part of studies
to look at and improve their effectiveness. Public cord blood banks -- where blood drawn from umbilical cords and placentas
at birth is kept frozen -- need to quadruple their supply to find a match for every leukemia patient who needs one. With 4
million births a year in this country, and most cord blood thrown away, that should not be a problem once more public money
comes into play, doctors said. A federal Institute of Medicine committee is already looking into the best way to set up
a national cord blood supply, and is scheduled to complete its report in March. "I know our committee will consume this
study avidly," said Kristine Gebbie, chairman of the group. The first bone marrow transplants were done in the 1960s;
cord blood transplants started in the 1990s. Stem-cell transplants save only 20 percent to 30 percent of the patients who
hope to grow new immune systems. But without the treatment, virtually all of them would die. Some researchers said techniques
they have developed in the past two years, since the study ended, already have boosted their success. Most doctors consider
cord blood more appropriate for smaller people, because it contains fewer stem cells than marrow. In the two studies, cord
blood recipients tended to weigh less than those who got marrow -- an average of 22 pounds less in the U.S. research, about
18 in the European study. There are two competing U.S. public cord bank systems, one holding about 38,000 vials, the other
27,000. Together, they do not add up to the supply kept by just one of the 20 or so private banks kept for paying families.

Follow-up:
washingtonpost.com
Stem Cell Reality
By David A. Shaywitz
Friday, April 29, 2005; A23
This
week the National Academies released new guidelines for research involving human embryonic stem cells, the latest milestone
in what has been an unusually eventful time for investigators in this field. Last November the voters of California approved
$3 billion in funding for stem cell research, and earlier this month Massachusetts lawmakers approved powerful new legislation
that defines and defends this exciting new area of science. Yet, unless proponents of stem cell research learn to preach patience
as well as promise, their celebration will be short-lived.
Human
embryonic stem cells were first identified less than a decade ago. They captured the attention of scientists because of two
essential properties: They can duplicate themselves in a culture dish, and they can go on to form any cell type in the body.
The therapeutic potential seems both apparent and unlimited: Convert these cells into neurons and treat Parkinson's disease,
the reasoning goes; turn them into insulin cells and cure diabetes.
That's
the plan, anyway. In fact, the deliberate conversion of human embryonic stem cells into any other type of cell remains a formidable
scientific challenge. Even growing these stubborn cells is notoriously difficult. And even if we could make replacement cells
in a culture dish, we would still face the daunting task of introducing them into the body.
The
real question, however, isn't whether these problems will be solved, but when. And here, the unfortunate truth is that science
-- good science -- can be maddeningly slow. While stem cell advocates have helped voters connect embryonic stem cell research
with compelling images of patients who might one day benefit from treatment, such therapies are unlikely to emerge soon enough
to benefit most current proponents -- although patients with Type 1 diabetes may represent an important exception.
Soon
the advocacy groups that have been so instrumental in supporting stem cell science will face mounting pressure to demonstrate
that they have bet on the right technology. From the researchers, tremendous progress will be expected, and the science is
unlikely to keep pace with the eager expectations.
This
scenario has a familiar ring. For years it was not stem cells but gene therapy -- the idea of fixing a disease by mending
broken DNA -- that seemed to be the ultimate expression of molecular medicine. Cures, we were told, lay just around the corner.
Unfortunately, success turned out to be much harder to achieve in people than to diagram on a chalkboard. The tragic death
of clinical study volunteer Jesse Gelsinger, and the concurrent realization that the promised cures were years away, finally
burst the bubble. Today a disappointingly small number of hardy investigators remain in what was once medicine's most highly
anticipated new area of research.
Is
this going to be the fate of embryonic stem cell science in five or 10 years? I hope not, and yet it's also not very difficult
to imagine this happening. Already newspapers are filled with extravagant claims of progress and cures. These reports belie
the very slow rate of true scientific advancement. Add to this the explicit expectation of rapid clinical progress -- a key
component of California's recently approved stem cell initiative, for example -- and you have a recipe for trouble. If embryonic
stem cells are rushed into clinical trials before the solid science has been done, the resulting fiasco could easily doom
the entire future of the field.
How
can we avoid this fate? For starters, scientists must do a better job of articulating the limitations of our existing knowledge,
taking care to emphasize not only the ultimate therapeutic potential of these cells, but also how far we are from achieving
such therapies. Advocacy groups must also level with their stakeholders and explain why treatments based on stem cells will
take such a long time to materialize -- and why the wait is worth it. At the same time, these organizations must continue
to push scientists to work harder and achieve results faster, encouraging investigators to keep in mind the patients in whose
name the research is being conducted (and funded).
Editors
of scientific journals, as well as mainstream reporters, must shape up as well. Research articles of questionable quality
shouldn't be accepted for publication, even if they are certain to garner significant media coverage. Similarly, journalists
must resist the temptation to lavish attention on every published scientific article with the words "stem cell" in the title.
Finally,
we would all do well to keep in mind that in contrast to the tidy, syncopated tableau of television's "CSI," science in the
real world is frequently tedious and almost always messy. But there are also moments of great clarity and wondrous insight
-- moments I anticipate we will experience with increasing frequency in stem cell research. In the end, I suspect embryonic
stem cells will evolve into a therapeutic tool even more useful than anything we can now envision. But the development of
this entirely new area of science will take dedication, funding and, above all, time. "Genius is eternal patience," Michaelangelo
observed. Let us hope that for those looking to stem cells for treatment, the wait will not be quite so long.
The writer is an endocrinologist and stem cell researcher at Harvard University.
7B Papers
A completed job application provides the employer with two kinds of information about you. First,
it provides answers to questions about your education and work experience. Second, it provides information about your ability
to follow directions, work neatly, spell correctly, and provide accurate and complete data. This information is provided by
"how" you fill out the application form.
A completed job application is a statement about your personal, educational, and work experience.
It is also a statement about some of your other very important characteristics as a person and as a prospective employee.
It is very important that you take the time to make every job application that you fill out a very positive statement about
you as a person and as a future employee. You need to be thorough in your preparation and then careful while you are filling
the application out.
When you fill out the form, be sure to follow directions. Be neat. Provide only positive information.
For example, list any unpaid volunteer experience in the work experience section. The job application represents who you are.
Task 1:
An employment application form sometimes makes it difficult for an individual to adequately summarize a complete background.
Write a cover letter (i.e. a letter sent along with other documents to explain more fully or provide additional information.)
according to the requirements mentioned in the text above detailing any additional information necessary to describe your
full qualifications for the specific position for which you are applying.
Task 2:
Fill out the empty
spaces in the letter below. The sender is the company with which you have already had an interview; in this letter they confirm
in writing an earlier verbal offer; the addressee is you.
___________________________________________________________
Company Name
June 6, 2005
[Your address]
Dear M _____________________________________
It was a pleasure having you visit our office recently, and I trust that we gave you an appreciable
understanding of the position for which you have been considered.
I would like you to know that the gentlemen with whom you spoke think very highly of you from
both a personal and professional standpoint, and we feel that you can make a decided contribution to our efforts. Therefore,
I would like to confirm my verbal offer to you for a position as ___________________________ in
our ________________________ Department at a salary of $1650 per month, based on a forty hour week.
We have endeavored to convey to you the career opportunities available at our company for an individual
with your background, and sincerely hope that your decision will be to join us.
It is necessary that we know your decision by July 15, 2005, so that we can plan accordingly.
I would like to reiterate our high regard for you, and in the interim, if I can be of help, please do not hesitate to call
me.
Very truly yours,
Task 3:
Now consider the
job you have applied for in terms of the work satisfaction it offers. It is understood that you don't know everything about
the position or organization, but take your best guess. Pick as many criteria as you feel fit to consider from the list below
and compare them to your personal qualities and your priorities.
(Example nr. 8: I do not want to spend more than two hours a day commuting. So the workplace should
be within easy reach of …; Example nr. 10: As I don’t feel comfortable in formal clothes, I would rather take
up a position that does not require me to represent my company in direct contact with clients.)
Criteria for a work satisfaction check list:
1. Will I enjoy working
with my future co-workers and supervisors?
2. Will I have a good
opportunity to express myself on the job?
3. Is the working environment
satisfactory?
4. Will I be fully using
my primary skills?
5. Is there sufficient
diversity and challenge?
6. Will I be able to
get the kind of feedback I require to actually see the results of my efforts?
7. Is there an opportunity
to learn and expand?
8. Is the commute to
and from work within satisfactory limits?
9. Are there open avenues
of communication?
10. Will I be able to
dress comfortably?
11. Will I be able to
get value from my work to the extent that I make a contribution?
12. Am I motivated and
satisfied with the ultimate purpose of the organization?
13. In terms of work
pleasure, is this opportunity close to any of my "dream jobs?"
14. Do I really want
to do this kind of work?
15. Is the salary and benefit package satisfactory?
Task 4:
Write an essay on your high hopes for a meaningful life in a highly interdependent
global society.
The following can be found on:
http://www.careercc.com/resumpr.shtml#Sally
Cover letters are necessary when sending your resume in the mail, but remember
to keep your cover letter short. A cover letters purpose is to obtain an interview, not tell a lengthy story. The focus should
be on your qualifications, and setting up an interview. There are two types of cover letters - specific and general. The specific
cover letter is directed at a specific company, specific person, and position. The specific cover letter personally addresses
the companies needs. It also sends a positive message to the employer that you are truly interested because you took the time
to write an individual letter. A general cover letter is often addressed Dear Employer, (with date omitted) and emphasizes
your qualifications in hopes that a position will be available to utilize your skills. Feel free to use the cover letter examples
below when preparing your own cover letters.
SALLY B. DOE
7124 S. Decoto Street Any Town, Any State 36254 Telephone:
(815) 879-2680
January 30, 2005
Mr. Smith - Dir. of Human Resources Raymond Kate Associates 524 Fair Lane
Street Any City, State 78194
Dear Mr. Smith:
I am responding to your advertisement in The City Tribune (dated 1/20/00), regarding
the Pharmaceutical Representative position. Please regard this letter as my formal application. Enclosed is my resume showing
my education, experience, and background.
I have over 7 years experience in the sales and marketing field, and 3 years experience
as an LPN staff nurse.
Throughout my sales and marketing career I won top sales awards, and trained other
sales representatives specific sales techniques to increase their sales. I enjoy working with the public, as well, demonstrating
products, and educating others in their uses. I believe I would excel in pharmaceutical sales because I truly find sales a
challenging and rewarding career; as well, my nursing background offers an advantage in better understanding the products
I would sell.
May I arrange an interview to further discuss my qualifications? I am available
for an interview at a mutually convenient time.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Sally B. Doe
Encl.
BILL J. DOE 942 Sunset Circle Hampton, Virginia 84217 (555) 555-0000
Dear Employer:
In response to your advertisement regarding the safety/loss control position in
your organization I am enclosing a resume for your review. Please consider this letter as my formal application presenting
my background, education and experience.
I have over 8 years experience in the Health and Safety field; and I am well versed
in the areas of Health and Safety issues in conjunction with state and federal guidelines.
I have considerable experience in dealing with insurance claims and litigation;
and a thorough knowledge of the process and procedures of the corporate environment. I work well with people and enjoy getting
the work at hand completed.
Below is a list of agencies I have extensive consulting experience with:
Virginia Workers Compensation Commission -- Environmental Protection Agency -- Occupational
Health and Safety Administration -- Department of Transportation -- Virginia Natural Resources Conservation Commission --
Federal Aviation Administration
May I arrange an interview to further discuss my qualifications? I am available
for an interview at a mutually convenient time.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Salary History: Planned Health Care, Inc. $38,000.00 Jonet Group, Inc. $25,750.00 City
of Millington $18,000.00
Sincerely,
Bill J. Doe
Encl.
Example: To Whom it May Concern Letter
To Whom it May Concern:
The purpose of this letter is to recommend Karen Smith for employment as an office
manager or related position.
Karen possesses excellent office and administrative skills necessary to administer
a project, while gaining the acceptance of other office personnel. The work she produces is on-time and accurate. This has
made Karen a valuable part of our management team. During her employment with us, we have acquired a larger percentage of
clientele. I believe her good business skills and pleasant personality have helped our business grow.
During the last three years Karen has worked her way from clerical worker to part
of our management team. This is due primarily to her ability to quickly comprehend difficult tasks. Karen is unique individual
with a positive attitude, who can accept responsibility to complete a project with little oversight or direction. Her excellent
secretarial skills and office administration skills make her a valuable asset. I would highly recommend her to any company
seeking these qualities in an individual.
Sincerely,
Mr. Jason Jenken
Example: Thank You Note
1/10/05
Attn: Mr. Alex Smith Raymond Kate Associates 4854 Bay Street Millington, Virginia
58745
Dear Mr. Smith:
Just a note to say thank you for giving me the opportunity to interview with your
company for the position of loss control specialist. I enjoyed our conversation and feel my experience and education would
complement Raymond Kate Associates. I look forward to being able to put my extensive knowledge and experience of working with
environmental protection agencies to bring about effective safety programs to your company.
As we discussed I have enclosed 3 letters of recommendation from my professional
acquaintances. In addition, I am also enclosing some of the safety programs I designed so you can see first hand the type
of work I am capable of performing to bring about the successful safety programs the government requires in organizations
today.
Again, thank you for your time. I am looking forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
Bill J. Doe
Links to more cover letter examples:
Cover Letter Example 1 - Technology Cover Letter
Cover Letter Example 2 - Marketing Cover Letter
Cover Letter Example 3 - Administrative Cover Letter
Cover Letter Example 4 - Management Cover Letter
Cover Letter Example 5 - Executive Cover Letter
Cover Letter Example 6 - Human Resources Cover Letter
FROM YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS:
I would like to apply for the position of designer advertised
in the ONYX snowboard magazine last week. [I am interested in the position of ...]
What I like about my future job is that other people will
respect me for what I do.
The only thing I'm afraid of is that in my future job there is a lot of competition.
I want to take public transport to and from work.
To ATTEND school: to be present at
WHETHER is used to introduce alternative possibilities: ... whether [not IF]
I will like this work or not.
Make sure that you understand the various [more than one, different] meanings of the German idiom ERREICHEN, and translate them accordingly. [to
reach, to achieve]
Paper 3
The anti-cosmetic surgery view
written by Sally Winthorp
At
its essence, cosmetic surgery is a symptom of the 'easy come, easy go' society that we live in. Everything can be bought -
from the ideal home to the perfect body - image is everything. There are apparently no boundaries and no limits. While some
may say these are the benefits of a free society, the cost of this pursuit of 'perfection' is that the notion of values and
development of the inner self are lost, buried in a mire of pert bums, large breasts and button noses. (1)
We
are instilling these values of surface beauty over inner well-being into the next generation and they are buying into
it; a recent survey published by a teen magazine (Bliss - source BBC News), states that one third of its readers want cosmetic
surgery. Idealism like this can only translate into a more hollow, materialistic and shallow society than the shell we already
inhabit and that is not good news for anyone.
Unfortunately, many of the people who opt for cosmetic surgery are actually trying
to heal a deeper hurt than any surgeon's knife will ever reach.
In the aforementioned survey, 85% of respondents stated that appearance affected
self-esteem, but what these adolescents don't seem to realise is that a smaller waist or a wrinkle-free brow will not make
a person value themselves. Confidence and self-esteem can only be built on a strong foundation of self-value and belief
in your own abilities, not on the shaky, and inevitably fleeting, platform of beauty.
Having said all this, I do believe that it is important to enhance
the traits you've been given; I wear make-up, I dye my hair, I think that it's important to be active and keep your body fit
and healthy, but I don't believe cosmetic surgery is the answer. There are inherent risks involved with any surgery
(2), and in most cases surgery is kept as the last option. It therefore
defies logic that people will welcome the knife so readily in order to improve their appearance. How do we justify
this flippant view of cosmetic surgery? My breasts might explode, but they look great? I may never wake up but at least
I'll have a smaller nose?
Annotations:
(1) paraphrase: “at a time when only outward appearance, that excites men, counts.”
surface beauty: outward appearance
aforementioned: referred to earlier in the text
foundation: basis
(2) paraphrase: “ risks are an essential part of any surgery.”
it defies logic: you can’t understand
flippant view of: light-minded attitude about
Tasks:
-
What
does cosmetic surgery stand for these days?
-
Which
drawbacks of an “'easy come, easy go' society” does the text bring up?
-
Comment
on the statement “Image is everything.”
-
What
is the “deeper hurt” the text mentions?
-
Why
is confidence built on beauty shaky?
-
What
is Sally Winthorp’s opinion on make-up?
-
What
is Sally Winthorp’s conclusion?
-
How
far do first impressions influence you?
-
What do
you consider important for a lasting relationship?
-
Comment on this quotation:
"I'm tired of all this
nonsense about beauty being only skin-deep. That's deep enough. What do you want - an adorable pancreas?"
Jean Kerr, The Snake
Has All The Lines (1960)
Additional annotation: You use the expression 'easy come, easy go' to indicate that the
person/society you are talking about does not care much about money.
Yours Truly's version of an acceptable text:
(1, 2, 3) In today's fast-going society with all its shallow values, when almost everything
goes, almost everything can be bought, and only outward appearance counts, a growing segment of the population considers
cosmetic surgery to be the basis of self-confidence. At a time, when traditional values like the development of the inner
self are lost, an evermore materialistic and hollow society doesn't feel the deeper hurt anymore that no cosmetic surgeon's
knife will ever reach.
(3, 4) The deeper hurt is the lack of confidence in the traits one was born with and
the lack of education one should have been given by one's parents. Sally Winthorp even claims that today's teens who want
to have plastic surgery performed at their young age have had the pursuit of the shaky and inevitably fleeting concept of
'perfection' instilled into them by their parents.
(5) As history shows, the concept of perfection goes with the times. ... [see course book]
(6, 7) Sally Winthorp's conclusion is that these days even youngsters in their pursuit
of perfection are willing to take incalculable risks from disfigurement to death, when it would be much wiser to enhance
the traits you have been given in a healthy and unobtrusive way.
(8, 9) Although "first impressions go a long way", you can't build a lasting relationship
on them. First impressions, that hardly ever go deeper than skin-deep, may be good for a one-night stand but are certainly
no basis for a relationship "till death us do part." A long-lasting relationship is based on mutual trust,
which in our context means that you can rely on your partner to remain at your side "for better or for worse" and not to leave
you just because Prince(ss) Charming waits round the corner.
(10) The quotation is cynical and obviously comes from a shallow mind who sees - his?/her?
- any partner as a sex object rather than an individual personality worth exploring.
More quotations about beauty
Jean Kerr born July 1923, Scranton, Pennsylvania, U.S. died January 5, 2003,
White Plains, New York
 Jean Kerr. © Archive Photos
|
|
née Jean Collins American writer, remembered for her plays and for
her humorous prose on domestic themes.
From your own contributions:
We live in the belief that ... - to
be of the same opinion - To put it in a nutshell, ... [Kurz gesagt ...]
When the author of this text, an adult, says, We are instilling these values ... into
the next generation, you, a teenager, cannot use this sentence as an argument as if 'you were instilling...'
You, teenagers, are the ones who are buying into it. In any case
you are supposed to paraphrase such crucial statements.
'to make your image better' is bad style,
when you (should) know a more appropriate [NOT 'better'] idiom like 'to improve'.
For a lasting relationship it is important to trust
each other. (See above for a paraphrase.)
For me, first impressions are important. I know
that this attitude is questionable, but that is how I feel. I would never approach a girl in a disco if she didn't look attractive
to me. (See above for alternative view.)
Modern society doesn't seem to know any boundaries
or limits. Today's cosmetic surgery craze even among teenagers is a symptom of the 'easy come, easy go' society. People readily
undergo plastic surgery in order to... Some people who opt for cosmetic surgery try to heal a psychological problem they have
with an operation on their bodies. You have to have a strong mind so that you can't easily get hurt deeper down. As they say,
beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. S. W. doesn't think that plastic surgery is the answer to a person's low self-esteem.
One of the drawbacks of the 'easy come, easy go'
society is that people for whom money doesn't matter think they can literally buy everything. The attitude that
image is everything is as old as mankind is. From Stone Age man to the ancient Egyptians and Greeks to modern man, human
beings who matched (past tense!) the required looks of their time have had (present perfect tense!) a better chance in
life, be it the job or the chance to procreate. However, time is fleeting and so is beauty.
Breast implants bear risks because they may rupture
and cause all sorts of health problems including breast disfigurement.
I look for that special expression in his/her eyes.
Final 'laughing matter':
The alchemist Paracelsus once proposed that he had created a false human being through his science. Called a homunculus, this creature
stood no more than 12 inches tall and did the work usually associated with a golem. However, after a short time, the homunculus
was known to turn on it's creator and run away. The recipe consisted of a bag of bones, sperm, skin fragments and hair from
any animal you wanted it to be a hybrid of. This was to be laid in the ground surrounded by horse manure for forty days, at
which point the embryo would form. This supposed beast relied upon the theories of spontaneous generation. 
Paper Two
Are there
ethics in advertising or does the need for profit take precedence over any principles?
Advertising: the attempt to send information to people to convince
them to spend their money with a certain company. This concept is the foundation of much of the modern financial world. The
ads can attack any of the senses. Sight, hearing, touch even smell or taste. For example movie popcorn has a specific smell
that's been refined over years to entice others in the movie theater to buy their own large bucket.
Advertising is big business. Billions of dollars are spent each MONTH
on advertising. Many industries exist solely due to the influx of money advertising brings in. The cable TV industry, magazines,
newspapers and many other media and non-media industries would be drastically changed if they couldn't sell advertising space.
Plus we wouldn't know what to buy.
Because of these facts, companies try all sorts of tactics to get our
attention and money. Sometimes these attempts involve illegal, underhanded or dirty tricks.
One of the main problems is that often times, these underhanded techniques work all too well.
They're based on deception, misdirection and other highly refined but sharply unethical techniques.
In many ways, and especially on the internet, the porn industry
has had its share of unethical advertising. One of the most common tactics used by the porn industry websites is to create
pages that rank well for unrelated but "free" stuff. You are searching for something, say information on the latest Angelina
Jolie movie, on the search engines and you see a search result offering free videos of Ms. Jolie. Sounds cool of course and
you head to a page which flashes tons of banner ads (Which the owner gets paid for if you click on any of them. Another unethical
practice.) The page offers secret pictures and videos of Ms. Jolie completely naked. Just click this link. You click and go
to another dizzying array of ads before finding another link. You end up at a page that offers plenty of sexy naked women.
All you have to do is fill in your name and credit card number...
Source of text: http://www.rubak.com/article.cfm?ID=13
Adman 1 Adman
2 (This cartoon is not a comment on the gay lifestyle.)
Tasks:
1. Why is advertising important for the economy and for
us, the consumers?
2.
What is the aim of advertising?
3.
What are the tactics of advertising?
4.
What is the problem of unethical techniques?
5. In Adman 1, what does the lady want from the gentleman?
6. Why is she not happy with the initial suggestion?
7. Put yourself in the position of the gentleman in frame 4 and
render his feelings.
8. If Adman 2 is not a comment on the gay lifestyle,
what ethical question does this cartoon raise, nevertheless.
(This is a difficult one. If you can’t
or don’t want to do this
task, forget it.)
9.
Explain your opinion about the cartoons. Do you like them?
10. How far can advertising go in your opinion?
Yours
Truly's version of an acceptable text:
If
we didn't have advertising, we wouldn't be able to watch commercial channels that "exist solely due to the influx of money
advertising brings in." Their raison d'etre is to sell us TV consumers to advertising companies and not - as many may think
- to entertain us. It is the share of viewers that a programme has that determines the per-second-fee for a TV spot.
We
couldn't afford quality papers and/or glossy magazines if they didn't - at least partially - earn money by selling advertising
space. Equally, public services like buses or trains would cost much more if ... [see above].
The
aim of advertising is to convince consumers to spend their money on a certain product. So all sorts of tactics are used
to get our attention and money.
[Add
your own observations. Ads entering the subconscious with the victims unaware that they are being attacked, are an interesting
example of underhanded techniques.]
Especially
the porn industry is notorious for its sly tactics that work all too well because ... [Add your own observations. "Exploitation
of male instincts" would be one in the context of this paper.]
It is well known that
- also outside the porn industry - sex sells. No wonder that in Adman 1 the initial suggestion is to exploit the male lust
for female flesh. Traditional advertising surrounds a product that is to be sold to men with gorgeous women in bikinis.
Women feel that they are seen as objects and this is what the lady in Adman 1 finds politically incorrect. When the gentleman
comes up with the reverse strategy and wants to put male body builders on the advertising poster, the same lady does not feel
to be the prey of male lust anymore but turns into the predator lusting for male flesh. The cartoon uncovers double standards
in the lady's thinking that baffle the gentleman in frame four.
Adman
2 is "a dig at people that are happy to do business with any groups that they normally wouldn't want to be associated with,
as long as they can make money from them."
Adman
1 addresses a problem that is as old as advertising is. It needed women's lib in the 1960s(!) - only 40 years ago - to make
women aware of the fact that their sexuality was being exploited. Being seen as an individual and not as a 'sex object', is
an 'unalienable right' [see US Constitution] and so a woman protesting (half-)naked women in ads should also criticize
reverse strategies.
The
ethical question raised in Adman 2 is one of recent advertising history. In modern times, when lifestyles have become more
versatile, criss-crossing traditional dividing lines between 'straight' and 'gay', the "high discretionary income" of gays
('pink money') has come under 'attack' by the advertising industry.
What
you need, is self-confident gays, women, you name it, who are aware of the power they literally hold in their hands and don't
spend their money with companies that in one way or other discriminate against them.
A firm is using 'real women' in its beauty product promotion because it says stick-thin airbrushed
models make women feel bad about themselves.

A survey for Dove Firming moisturiser found two-thirds of UK women feel depressed about their figures
and have low body confidence as a result of beauty advertising.

The study found three-quarters of women wanted to see more realistic-looking models in beauty ads and
the media.
The women rated Renee Zellweger in her more curvy guise as Bridget Jones as their healthiest celebrity
role model - but the slimmed down version, when she starred as Roxie Hart, only came in at number eight.
Victoria Beckham was voted the least healthy role model by both men and women from the celeb selection.
The results have led to the new ad campaign, which Dove says is designed to celebrate real women and
boost their body confidence.
Women of different shapes and sizes are pictured in their underwear for the Dove Firming advertising
- and the company says the images have not been retouched in any way.
Psychologist Dr Linda Papadopolous, an expert in women's body attitudes, said: "Women are constantly
bombarded with images of often unrealistic and unattainable perfection. When the girl in the mirror doesn't look like the
girl in the magazine or on the TV, it's not surprising that women's self esteem can be affected.
"It's great that companies like Dove are starting to listen to real women's concerns and talking to
them about feeling good rather than performing miracles or selling the beauty myth."
The company's research polled 2,317 men and women, and found strong negative effects of beauty images
on British women's self esteem. 
|

Paper
One
Voting for president is
a leap of faith. All citizens can do is mix guesswork and hope, examining what the candidates have done in the past, their
apparent priorities and their general character. It's on those three grounds that The New York Times on the web enthusiastically
endorsed John Kerry for president on October 17, 2004:
We look back on the past four years with hearts nearly breaking, both for the lives unnecessarily lost and for the
opportunities so casually wasted. Time and again, history invited George W. Bush to play a heroic role, and time and again
he chose the wrong course. The Bush White House has always given us the worst aspects of the American right without any of
the advantages. We believe that with John Kerry as president, the nation will do better.
Over the last year
we have come to know Mr. Kerry as more than just an alternative to the status quo. We like what we've seen. He has qualities
that could be the basis for a great chief executive, not just a modest improvement on the incumbent.
We have been impressed with Mr. Kerry's wide knowledge and clear thinking - something that became more
apparent once he was reined in by that two-minute debate light.
He is blessedly willing to re-evaluate decisions when conditions change. And while Mr. Kerry's service
in Vietnam was first over-promoted and then over-pilloried, his entire life has been devoted to public service, from the war
to a series of elected offices. He strikes us, above all, as a man with a strong moral core.
Mr. Kerry has the capacity to do far, far better. He has a willingness - sorely missing in Washington these days -
to reach across the aisle. We are relieved that he is a strong defender of civil rights, that he would remove unnecessary
restrictions on stem cell research and that he understands the concept of separation of church and state.
He has always understood
that America's appropriate role in world affairs is as leader of a willing community of nations, not in my-way-or-the-highway
domination.
Text adapted from The New
York Times on the web, October 17, 2004. “John Kerry for President”
Tasks:
1. “The Bush White House has always
given us the worst aspects of the American right without any of the advantages.”
From the list below, choose at least 5 examples for Mr. Bush's disastrous tenure and discuss them in detail.
1. government turned over to the radical right
2. antiterrorist campaign
3. misrepresentations to the American people
4. human rights and civil liberties
5. incompetence and inept management
6. Supreme Court
7. economy
8. fiscal recklessness
9. environment
2. Discuss in what way Senator John Kerry might have been “a great chief executive, not just a modest improvement
on” President elect, George W. Bush.
3. If you had the opportunity to vote, what would your criteria be to
vote for a candidate? | |
7B
To complement Compact Unit 6:
Globalization is now an ubiquitous word. We hear and read it everywhere. Perhaps none of the earlier
epochs that have affected the course of humanity were more spectacular and dramatic than the evolution of a highly interdependent
global society -- a global village or city in which a thing has value only if it has any utility.
The advances in technology,
communication systems [see blue text below for more on advances in communications systems] and
trade have brought about unprecedented developments in the lives of the people on the globe. However, all these developments
have not led to much improvement in the quality of life. On the one hand, many of the problems faced by humanity remain unsolved,
and on the other, a lot of new problems have emerged. Nobody is sure of the consequences if the challenges posed by the global
phenomena are not met. (Erosion of human values, onslaught of materialism, spread of fantastic entertainment, etc.)
We have to examine the process of globalization critically. Recently an international
forum on globalization stated that "it is not the latest phase of human progress but rather an ideology imposed on the world
by transnational corporations and their followers in governments and universities" (Jay Walljasper, 1996).
Globalization can be seen as having gone on for centuries and it is bound with
capitalist modernity and the expansion of the capitalist system. Therefore it is not new. For the developing countries it
is the modern version of "colonization."
But globalization is not a mere economic or political issue. It has immense
effects on the culture and values of life in each place. It is in the realm of culture that globalization is most visible
and apparent. Globalization is leading to cultural homogeneity. There is a rapidly spreading consumer culture initiated by
multinational companies like McDonald's and Coca-Cola. The world is now full of products, images and ideas like Madonna, rap
music or Hollywood films, which are shown as "global popular" almost to the extinction of distinctive native forms of culture
and entertainment. "New technologies are changing the nature of work and creating new forms of leisure, including the hyperreality
of cyberspace, new virtual realities, and new modes of information and entertainment. Capital is producing a new technoculture,
a new form of the entertainment and information society, and everything from education to work to politics and everyday life
is dramatically changing. The desire for material progress has gripped the world. Even the youth are running after money and
enjoyments rather than ideals. There is an ideological vacuum in people's minds. The future seems to be only for those who
grab. The jungle law of the survival of the fittest is coming back.
It is not an exaggeration to say that the world is now ruled by a handful of
multinational corporations. Their empires are much bigger than any previous ones in history -- Greek, Roman, French or British.
They cannot be controlled by any national governments, individually nor collectively. They can bring any nation to its knees
if it fails to follow their norms. No community on earth can enjoy security, prosperity and satisfaction without their blessings.
"... not only that corporate powers control the world's traffic in microchips and millet, but also the flow of information,
entertainment, culture, and basic ideas about what constitutes the good life" (Jay Walljasper, 1996). The divisions among
human beings -- "the haves and the have-nots" -- have taken new connotations: earlier they were mainly based on money and
power; now they depend upon information and technology (the tools to control the world).
Globalization is the good news to some who are capable of international competition,
but not so good news for those who fall behind.
The "winners" have as much at stake from the possible consequences of social instability as the
"losers." Dani Rodrik says "... social disintegration is not a spectator sport -- those on the sidelines also get splashed
with mud from the field. Ultimately, the deepening of social fissures can harm all." Even advanced societies are ill-equipped
to hail the consequences of globalization. It has crated a lot of myths which have been uncritically accepted by many. For
example, one who is not dressed in a particular brand of world class is considered unblessed and unfashionable. "... and all
those problems are intensified by the sense of inferiority and self-hate that arises in people who don't look like the svelte,
blonde actors ... who can't buy all the lovely goods featured in the globalized market place of Benetton" (Jay Walljasper,
1996).
Adapted from: The Role of Religions in a Globalized World by Abraham Oommen.
In: http://www.wcc-coe.org/wcc/what/interreligious/cd33-10.html 
Further Reading:
Googlers Do Without
CBS,
May 9, 2005
Did you notice that the world stopped spinning for 15 minutes on Saturday afternoon? If you were
enjoying the great outdoors you probably didn't, but if you were at your computer, surfing the web, you might have very well
stumbled on the global catastrophe.
OK, I admit it. Nobody died and no buildings crumbled, but web surfers throughout
the world had to spend a full quarter hour without access to Google or any of its services including news, email and comparison
shopping.
I rely on Google's Gmail email service and had to go without email for a few minutes. How dare they force
me to pick up the phone, or shudder the thought, have a face-to-face conversation to communicate with people?
The
culprit, according to Google spokesman David Krane, was a DNS lookup glitch. DNS, which stands for "Domain Name Server," is
the process that translates friendly domain names like Google.com into those almost impossible to remember IP (Internet Protocol)
addresses. If anyone had typed in Google's actual IP address (http://216.239.37.99/), they would have reached the site during the outage, according to Krane.
The web, of course, was swirling with speculation
as to whether Google had been hacked and, indeed, respected blogger and journalist Om Malik (http://gigaom.com/) reported
that he and other web users had been misdirected to another web page when they typed in Google.com. That, Malik posted later,
may have been a "result of browsers not being able to resolve to Google.com, and instead (stumbling) upon google.com.net."
Why We Care
What's most interesting about this story is not that Google was down for 15 minutes. That
can happen to any website and, indeed has happened to many well-known sites many times over the years.
What's interesting
here is that we care. I first heard about it when I got a call from an editor at a radio station who, rightfully, considered
it news. The Associated Press reported on the outage and, of course, I'm writing about it here.
The fact is that Google
isn't just any website. It's part of the daily routines of tens of millions of people around the world. It's probably an understatement
to say that a Google outage is as important a story if a major TV network went black or if the phone company couldn't get
calls through for a few minutes.
The fact that Google's 15-minute outage was noticed says wonders about how the world
has come to depend on that company which, just a few years ago, was simply a good idea by a couple of Stanford graduate students.
I could go on for pages on what that means, both technologically and philosophically. I think it says something about
our sense of priorities. Like cell phones and other technologies we've come to depend on, what was unavailable yesterday is
indispensable today.
Of course the reverse is also true. Back in the 70s, I was devastated when my IBM Selectric typewriter
was out of order. Today, a typewriter repair shop is about as popular as businesses that service buggy whips. In fact, as
I typed the word "Selectric," I noticed that Microsoft Word flagged it as a misspelling. Three decades ago, it was almost
a household word that certainly would have been in spell checkers - if there were any at the time.
That fact is not
lost on smart people who run companies like Google. The good ones know that they have no God-given right to remain relevant.
If they don't keep innovating, their role in the world will be right down there with that of the typewriter, eight-track tape
deck and the rest of yesterday's news.
I remember when AltaVista was the best search engine on the web - until it
was eclipsed by Yahoo and Google. I also remember when the two leading ways to get online were companies called CompuServe
and Prodigy. As these companies have learned, it's not just a question of keeping your business "up," it's also a matter of
keeping it up-to-date.
Video Search
Yahoo, by the way, has been busy keeping itself up-to-date. Its
new video search service is amazing. What's fun about it is that you can use it to find video clips from yesterday.
Go
to Yahoo, clicking on the video link and trying typing in "3 Stooges" or "John Kennedy." I'm not sure if all the people posting
those video clips are in compliance with the copyright law, but they - along with Yahoo and other video search services -
are sure keeping the web fun and interesting.
A syndicated technology columnist for nearly two decades, Larry Magid serves as on
air Technology Analyst for CBS Radio News. His technology reports can be heard several times a week on the CBS
Radio Network. Magid is the author of several books including "The Little PC Book."By Larry Magid ©MMV CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
7B
If... We Could Stop The Violence
Source: BBC, WEDNESDAY, 22 DECEMBER,
2004
While the connection between crime and poverty is well known, links between
violence and biological make-up are still being explored. Could - and should - people's physiological predisposition to violent
behaviour ever be managed by the state?
Here
are just some facts surrounding the issues of crime, violence and biological predisposition:
· More than
one million violent crimes (violence against the person, sexual offences and robberies) were recorded in 2003/04 - a 12% increase
on the previous year.
(Source: Home Office statistical bulletin - "Crime in England and
Wales 2003-2004")
· 10% of all
offenders are responsible for over half of all crime. They account for at least 50% of serious convictions.
(Source: Home Office research - Annex B of Criminal Justice:
the way forward Cm 5074, 2001)
· Experts have
linked violent behaviour to environmental factors during childhood. Research shows that poor living conditions in economically
deprived areas and poor parenting of young children increase the risk of violent behaviour in adulthood.
(Source: Youth Justice Board research - "Risk and protective factors
associated with youth crime and effective interventions to prevent it", November 2001)
· 70,000 children
in the UK are receiving medication for ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder). (Source: Meidplus UK Data, April
2003)
· However,
it is believed there are many more undiagnosed children - it is estimated as many as 5% of school age children have ADHD and
100,000 children need treatment.
(Source: National Institute for Clinical Excellence - Technology
Appraisal Guidance no. 13, October 2000)
· 23% of all
crime has been attributed to poor or non-existent diagnosis of ADHD in children in care homes. (Source: Dale C and Storey
L, Nursing Praxis-Care and Treatment of Offenders with a Learning Disability)
· Court records
suggest that ADHD youths are four to five times more likely to be arrested and to have multiple arrests and convictions.
(Sources: Weiss, G., & Hechtman, L., (1986). Hyperactive
children grown up. New York, N.Y.: The Guilford Press; Lambert, N. M. (1988). Adolescent outcomes for hyperactive children.
American Psychologist, 43, 786-799; Mannuzza, S., Klein, R.G., Konig, P.H. and Giampino, T.L. (1989) Hyperactive boys almost
grown up: IV. Criminality and its relationship to psychiatric status, Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 1073-1079; Satterfield,
J.H., Hoppe, C.M. and Schell, A.M., (1982) A prospective study of delinquency in 110 adolescent boys with attention deficit
disorder and 88 normal adolescent boys, American Journal of Psychiatry, 139 (6), 795-798; Satterfield, T., Swanson, J., Schell,
A., Lee, F. (1994) Prediction of anti-social behaviour in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder boys from aggression/defiance
scores)
· Studies using
brain imaging (positron emission topography or PET) have shown that a group of murderers had poor functioning of the prefrontal
cortex part of the brain - the area believed to control and regulate aggressive behaviour. Some scientists believe therefore
that a person with a damaged or poor functioning prefrontal cortex has a tendency to be violent.
(Source: Brain abnormalities in murderers indicated by positron
emission tomography. Raine A, Buchsbaum M, LaCasse L. Biol Psychiatry. September 1997,15;42(6):495-508)
· Earlier studies
had already shown that damage to the brain caused by birth complications have both been linked to violent behaviour.
(Source: Kandel, E., and Mednick, S.A. 1991. Perinatal complications
predict violent offending. Criminology 29(3):519-529.)
· A 2003 study
in Mauritius using brain scans (magnetic resonance imaging or MRI) showed that brain activity could be boosted by an enriched
lifestyle (better diet and exercise) in the early years of life, helping to prevent violent behaviour. By 23 years old, subjects
were 64% less likely to have criminal records than those who did not have the enriched lifestyle.
(Source: Effects of Environmental Enrichment at Ages 3-5
Years on Schizotypal Personality and Antisocial Behavior at Ages 17 and 23 Years. Am J Psychiatry 2003 160: 1627-1635)
· A study of
a Dutch family in 1993 was the first to suggest the link between a genetic defect and extreme aggression. Several generations
of men in the family had committed violent crimes. The research found that these men all had a genetic mutation that caused
low levels of an enzyme called MAO-A. (Source: Abnormal behavior associated with a point mutation in the structural gene
for monoamine oxidase A. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Vol 262 (5133) 22 October 1993 pp 578-580)
· However,
biological factors alone do not necessarily indicate a predisposition to violence. A study of abused boys in New Zealand found
that abused children were more likely to grow up to show anti-social behaviour if they had low levels of MAO-A.
(Source: Caspi et al., Science, vol. 297, p851 Caspi, A. Moffitt,
T.E. et al. 2002. Role
of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 297(Aug. 2):851-854)
· In 1991, a 64-year-old man was tried for murder. Brain scans
showed that he had a cyst pressing on the prefrontal cortex part of the brain and his defence team planned to use this as
part of his defence (although the case was never presented after the plea was changed). (Source: The Legal Admissibility
of Positron Emission Tomography Scans in Criminal Cases: People v. Spyder Cystkopf. Weiss Z. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 1996
Jul;1(3):202-210)
Connections between crime and biological make-up are increasingly becoming a hot topic for discussion.
Two personal and opposing accounts argue the case for and against.
Adrian Raine, Professor of Psychology, University of Southern California,
sets out his view:
Unlocking crime: the biological key
Until recently it was thought that the causes of crime lay just in social factors like poverty
and unemployment. Yet repeat offending criminal behaviour is a clinical disorder, with brain impairments playing a key role.
New research is now showing that genetic and biological factors play an equal, if not greater, role than social factors in
crime causation.
Within this new field of biocriminology, brain imaging findings are revealing dramatic new insights
into the criminal mind. There are now 71 brain imaging studies showing that murderers, psychopaths, and individuals with aggressive,
antisocial personalities have poorer functioning in the prefrontal cortex - that part of the brain involved in regulating
and controlling emotion and behaviour. More dramatically, we now know that the brains of criminals are physically different
from non-criminals, showing an 11% reduction in the volume of grey matter (neurons) in the prefrontal cortex.
'Bad brains'
Violent offenders just do not have the emergency brakes to stop their runaway aggressive behaviour.
Literally speaking, bad brains lead to bad behaviour.
Dramatic advances are also being made in the areas of molecular and behaviour genetics. Over 100
twin and adoption studies have convincingly shown that genetic processes account for 50% of antisocial and criminal behaviour.
Of the remaining half that is environmental, biology accounts for part of this. For example, physical
child abuse can cause brain damage that in turn results in antisocial, aggressive behaviour.
Genetic processes are also at play in shaping aggressive behaviour in children. There is exciting
new evidence that an abnormality in one specific gene (monoamine oxidase A), when combined with child abuse, predisposes to
violent offending in adulthood. In a similar fashion, birth complications, when combined with maternal rejection in the first
year of life, results in higher violence at age 34.
Breakthroughs
The biological and genetic findings are now incontrovertible; the evidence is too strong to ignore.
These new breakthroughs have important implications for crime prevention.
One of the reasons why we have repeatedly failed to stop crime is because we have systematically
ignored the biological and genetic contributions to crime causation. We instead need to focus efforts on new interventions
that will improve brain structure and function.
New research has just shown that childhood malnutrition is linked to poor brain functioning (low
IQ) and conduct disorder in early adulthood. Giving three-year-olds better nutrition (and more physical exercise) for just
two years results in better brain functioning (EEG) at age 11, and a 35% reduction in crime 20 years later at age 23.
Prisoners given fish oil (rich in omega-3, a long-chain fatty acid that is critical for brain structure
and function) show reduced aggressive and antisocial behaviour.
Low physiological arousal (e.g. low sweat and heart rates) is a well-replicated risk factor for
crime and violence, but stimulants (drugs which increase arousal) are effective in reducing aggressive and antisocial behaviour
in children.
Future
Where will this new biological approach take us? If we really want to stop crime, the best investment
society can make is to intervene very early on. Better prenatal and perinatal health care, better nutrition early in life,
and medication for severely aggressive children can be implemented right now.
The next decade will reveal new discoveries regarding specific genes that cause violent behaviour,
and these findings could result in new drugs to correct the neurotransmitter brain abnormalities that cause violence.
In 50 years time, will we be conducting reparative brain surgery on prisoners to correct the faulty
neural circuits that give rise to violence?
Rocket science perhaps - but there is an uncanny habit for today's science fiction to become tomorrow's
reality.
Steven Rose, Professor of Biology, Open University,
sets out his views:
Violence not detectable by brain
imaging
There is a revealing moment in the IF drama in which the "lecturer" addressing his class of bored
students shows a picture of the Jarrow hunger march in the 1930s. If poverty is the cause of violence, he asks, why was there
relatively little of it then, but so much more today? He concludes the cause must be located in the brain and in the genes.
It is true that there has been an increase in violent crime since the 1960s, and an even greater
increase, fostered by the tabloid press and the government, in the fear of crime. However, what any alert student would quickly
have pointed out to the lecturer is as there cannot have been time since the 1930s for genetic change to occur, as it requires
hundreds of generations. Since our brains remain the same now as they were then, the genetic argument cannot be right either.
And of course as a child gets half its genes from its father and half from its mother, the refrain in the programme of "like
father like son" is a crass genetic error.
If Liam has ADHD (if that were a sensible diagnosis, which many child psychologists would doubt),
and if ADHD were a genetic condition (for which there is no strong evidence), then it would be as likely to be inherited from
his mother as his father.
External factors
If there is more violent crime today we have to look for other reasons than inside peoples' brains.
Guns and drugs other than alcohol and nicotine are more available, there is a growing gap between rich and poor, and life
in sink estates, perhaps especially for young men, offers little hope.
But despite all this, one might argue that maybe there is something different about the brains
or the genes of someone prepared to be violent, and that a genetic test or a brain imaging, as in the programme, might reveal
it. This is only true up to a point.
There is some evidence that children with a particular genetic mutation, if brought up in an abusive
environment, are more likely to be violent or abusive in turn when they become adult. But the crucial factor is the interaction
between gene (which is rare) and environment (which is common), so if we want to do something about it we should try to prevent
any child, with or without any particular gene, from being abused.
'Beware'
There is also some evidence that some people diagnosed as psychopathic may show particular brain
abnormalities. But many people so diagnosed do not show such abnormalities, and many people who are behaviourally not violent
do show them. So the predictive power of such a brain scan is pretty much zero.
Furthermore of course, people are violent for many different reasons, almost none of which are
detectable by brain imaging. I doubt if you would be able to explain the reasons why they have been responsible for some 100,000
deaths in Iraq by doing brain scans on Tony Blair or George W Bush, to take an extreme example.
Nor would the violence of someone addicted to crack cocaine and desperate for a fix be attributable
to some genetic or neural predisposition.
The truth is that neuroscience and genetics can say little about the causes or the treatment of
violence in our society and cannot offer cheap fixes.
Beware forensic psychologists who say anything different, however glib they may sound.
They are selling snake oil.
7B
John Kerry for President
Senator
John Kerry goes toward the election with a base that is built more on opposition to George W. Bush than loyalty to his own
candidacy. But over the last year we have come to know Mr. Kerry as more than just an alternative to the status quo. We like
what we've seen. He has qualities that could be the basis for a great chief executive, not just a modest improvement on the
incumbent.
We
have been impressed with Mr. Kerry's wide knowledge and clear thinking - something that became more apparent once he was reined
in by that two-minute debate light. He is blessedly willing to re-evaluate decisions when conditions change. And while Mr.
Kerry's service in Vietnam was first over-promoted and then over-pilloried, his entire life has been devoted to public service,
from the war to a series of elected offices. He strikes us, above all, as a man with a strong moral core.
•
There
is no denying that this race is mainly about Mr. Bush's disastrous tenure. Nearly four years ago, after the Supreme Court
awarded him the presidency, Mr. Bush came into office amid popular expectation that he would acknowledge his lack of a mandate
by sticking close to the center. Instead, he turned the government over to the radical right.
Mr.
Bush installed John Ashcroft, a favorite of the far right with a history of insensitivity to civil liberties, as attorney
general. He sent the Senate one ideological, activist judicial nominee after another. He moved quickly to implement a far-reaching
anti-choice agenda including censorship of government Web sites and a clampdown on embryonic stem cell research. He threw
the government's weight against efforts by the University of Michigan to give minority students an edge in admission, as it
did for students from rural areas or the offspring of alumni.
When
the nation fell into recession, the president remained fixated not on generating jobs but rather on fighting the right wing's
war against taxing the wealthy. As a result, money that could have been used to strengthen Social Security evaporated, as
did the chance to provide adequate funding for programs the president himself had backed. No Child Left Behind, his signature
domestic program, imposed higher standards on local school systems without providing enough money to meet them.
If
Mr. Bush had wanted to make a mark on an issue on which Republicans and Democrats have long made common cause, he could have
picked the environment. Christie Whitman, the former New Jersey governor chosen to run the Environmental Protection Agency,
came from that bipartisan tradition. Yet she left after three years of futile struggle against the ideologues and industry
lobbyists Mr. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney had installed in every other important environmental post. The result has
been a systematic weakening of regulatory safeguards across the entire spectrum of environmental issues, from clean air to
wilderness protection.
•
The
president who lost the popular vote got a real mandate on Sept. 11, 2001. With the grieving country united behind him, Mr.
Bush had an unparalleled opportunity to ask for almost any shared sacrifice. The only limit was his imagination.
He
asked for another tax cut and the war against Iraq.
The
president's refusal to drop his tax-cutting agenda when the nation was gearing up for war is perhaps the most shocking example
of his inability to change his priorities in the face of drastically altered circumstances. Mr. Bush did not just starve the
government of the money it needed for his own education initiative or the Medicare drug bill. He also made tax cuts a higher
priority than doing what was needed for America's security; 90 percent of the cargo unloaded every day in the nation's ports
still goes uninspected.
Along
with the invasion of Afghanistan, which had near unanimous international and domestic support, Mr. Bush and his attorney general
put in place a strategy for a domestic antiterror war that had all the hallmarks of the administration's normal method of
doing business: a Nixonian obsession with secrecy, disrespect for civil liberties and inept management.
American
citizens were detained for long periods without access to lawyers or family members. Immigrants were rounded up and forced
to languish in what the Justice Department's own inspector general found were often "unduly harsh" conditions. Men captured
in the Afghan war were held incommunicado with no right to challenge their confinement. The Justice Department became a cheerleader
for skirting decades-old international laws and treaties forbidding the brutal treatment of prisoners taken during wartime.
Mr.
Ashcroft appeared on TV time and again to announce sensational arrests of people who turned out to be either innocent, harmless
braggarts or extremely low-level sympathizers of Osama bin Laden who, while perhaps wishing to do something terrible, lacked
the means. The Justice Department cannot claim one major successful terrorism prosecution, and has squandered much of the
trust and patience the American people freely gave in 2001. Other nations, perceiving that the vast bulk of the prisoners
held for so long at Guantánamo Bay came from the same line of ineffectual incompetents or unlucky innocents, and seeing the
awful photographs from the Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad, were shocked that the nation that was supposed to be setting the
world standard for human rights could behave that way.
•
Like
the tax cuts, Mr. Bush's obsession with Saddam Hussein seemed closer to zealotry than mere policy. He sold the war to the
American people, and to Congress, as an antiterrorist campaign even though Iraq had no known working relationship with Al
Qaeda. His most frightening allegation was that Saddam Hussein was close to getting nuclear weapons. It was based on two pieces
of evidence. One was a story about attempts to purchase critical materials from Niger, and it was the product of rumor and
forgery. The other evidence, the purchase of aluminum tubes that the administration said were meant for a nuclear centrifuge,
was concocted by one low-level analyst and had been thoroughly debunked by administration investigators and international
vetting. Top members of the administration knew this, but the selling went on anyway. None of the president's chief advisers
have ever been held accountable for their misrepresentations to the American people or for their mismanagement of the war
that followed.
The
international outrage over the American invasion is now joined by a sense of disdain for the incompetence of the effort. Moderate
Arab leaders who have attempted to introduce a modicum of democracy are tainted by their connection to an administration that
is now radioactive in the Muslim world. Heads of rogue states, including Iran and North Korea, have been taught decisively
that the best protection against a pre-emptive American strike is to acquire nuclear weapons themselves.
•
We
have specific fears about what would happen in a second Bush term, particularly regarding the Supreme Court. The record so
far gives us plenty of cause for worry. Thanks to Mr. Bush, Jay Bybee, the author of an infamous Justice Department memo justifying
the use of torture as an interrogation technique, is now a federal appeals court judge. Another Bush selection, J. Leon Holmes,
a federal judge in Arkansas, has written that wives must be subordinate to their husbands and compared abortion rights activists
to Nazis.
Mr.
Bush remains enamored of tax cuts but he has never stopped Republican lawmakers from passing massive spending, even for projects
he dislikes, like increased farm aid.
If
he wins re-election, domestic and foreign financial markets will know the fiscal recklessness will continue. Along with record
trade imbalances, that increases the chances of a financial crisis, like an uncontrolled decline of the dollar, and higher
long-term interest rates.
The
Bush White House has always given us the worst aspects of the American right without any of the advantages. We get the radical
goals but not the efficient management. The Department of Education's handling of the No Child Left Behind Act has been heavily
politicized and inept. The Department of Homeland Security is famous for its useless alerts and its inability to distribute
antiterrorism aid according to actual threats. Without providing enough troops to properly secure Iraq, the administration
has managed to so strain the resources of our armed forces that the nation is unprepared to respond to a crisis anywhere else
in the world.
•
Mr.
Kerry has the capacity to do far, far better. He has a willingness - sorely missing in Washington these days - to reach across
the aisle. We are relieved that he is a strong defender of civil rights, that he would remove unnecessary restrictions on
stem cell research and that he understands the concept of separation of church and state. We appreciate his sensible plan
to provide health coverage for most of the people who currently do without.
Mr.
Kerry has an aggressive and in some cases innovative package of ideas about energy, aimed at addressing global warming and
oil dependency. He is a longtime advocate of deficit reduction. In the Senate, he worked with John McCain in restoring relations
between the United States and Vietnam, and led investigations of the way the international financial system has been gamed
to permit the laundering of drug and terror money. He has always understood that America's appropriate role in world affairs
is as leader of a willing community of nations, not in my-way-or-the-highway domination.
We
look back on the past four years with hearts nearly breaking, both for the lives unnecessarily lost and for the opportunities
so casually wasted. Time and again, history invited George W. Bush to play a heroic role, and time and again he chose the
wrong course. We believe that with John Kerry as president, the nation will do better.
Voting for president is a leap of faith. A candidate can explain his positions in minute detail and wind
up governing with a hostile Congress that refuses to let him deliver. A disaster can upend the best-laid plans. All citizens
can do is mix guesswork and hope, examining what the candidates have done in the past, their apparent priorities and their
general character. It's on those three grounds that we enthusiastically endorse John Kerry for president.
The New York Times on the web - October 17, 2004.
Tasks:
- Make sure you get a broad view of the message of this text.
- Collect all the arguments that criticize "Mr. Bush's disastrous tenure".
- Find out in what way Senator John Kerry might be an alternative to
the incumbent President George W. Bush.
See below for 6B,
5B and WPF E/8 in this order.
...............7B...............
jhagfdsLJKAshdlk
...............6B...............
Gangs who fail exams on purpose
Gang culture in the north east of England means teenagers deliberately fail exams to stay cool,
a study says.
A poll of 4,000 Tyneside teenagers says peer pressure stops many pupils from studying or taking part in lessons.
Researchers say so-called "charvers" reject school as uncool and refuse to do GCSE course work, meaning they
fail their exams.
They say the situation could be the same across other UK cities, although the groups might have different names.
The charvers typically wear fake designer and sports gear and are usually from poor backgrounds.
Researchers questioned teenagers aged between 15 and 17.
They found the charvers' attitude was that school was uncool but college was OK, and that most expected to re-sit
their GCSEs at futher education colleges.
The research was by Lynne Howe, director of the South Tyneside Excellence in Cities programme.
She said: "For some youngsters - those known as charvers - being cool and well-thought of among their peers
is the most important thing.
"These youngsters
were largely from a deprived population but they didn't lack confidence or self-esteem.
"They deliberately fail their GCSEs because their social standing outside of school is more important than any
qualification.
"They were scared of being called names, physical threats and damage to the family home and property if they
were seen doing homework or answering questions in class, but they consider college cool."
The former teacher said the teenagers identified five different groups in school, including charvers, radgys
(more aggressive than charvers), divvies (impressionable hangers-on to the charvers), goths (wear dark clothes but often work
hard) and freaks, who work hard and are considered "normal" by teachers.
Nearly a third of the 15 year olds said they had been picked on for doing well at school, while the same proportion
admitted teasing others who participated in lessons.
The tribes
charvers - fake designer gear, school is uncool
radgys - aggressive, liable to be excluded
divvies - hangers-on to charvers
goths - wear dark clothes
freaks - hard-working, considered normal by school
More than 90% of bright pupils said they wanted to go to university but only one in four said they
were doing their best at school.
Some said they would rather fail their GCSEs and take resits at college, hoping to get into higher education
later, than risk being targeted by bullies while still at school.
The teenagers said they would like to be taught in groups not dependent on ability but on attitude, so those
who wanted to work could do so.
Lynne Howe said this idea came from both the charvers and the others.
"The most important lesson to be learnt from this is about classroom management and school discipline and the
expectation that children will work outside school."
She said charvers were prepared to do college work, so perhaps schools could consider setting a termly project
rather than nightly homework.
Mrs Howe also suggested teachers avoid asking pupils to put their hands up to answer questions and set more
group work because it was less divisive.
She will discuss her research at a conference on young people's attitudes to education run by Northumbria University
and the North East Assembly on 17 September.
Story from BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/education/3663916.stm
Published:
2004/09/17 00:18:12 GMT
© BBC MMIV
Link to source
Tasks:
Sum
up the text in your own words:
This text tells us about ….. (who?)
in ….. (where?) ….. who ….. (do what?) because ….. (why?). A researcher found that ..... (what?).
What
do kids who do not give in to peer group pressure fear?
They fear ….. (what? Consult dictionary for
correct grammar!) if they ….. (do what?). Some bullies even ….. (do what?).
Describe
the charvers and their hangers-on.
In
the context of this text work on the issues
- Social standing
in a peer group vs qualification
- Nightly homework
vs
termly project
- Individual
answers vs group work
The link page below, published November 30, 2004, completes
our discussion on the issue "Are you happy with your body?"
Please find words and phrases - and make them available to you - that you might
want to use in doing the tasks in Paper 2.
As always, if you have problems with the language or facts, don't hesitate
to ask me. Asking me questions about the contents of the suggested links is a welcome contribution to our English classes.
The links published on this website are FOR LANGUAGE ACQUISITION ONLY.
I DO NOT ENDORSE plastic surgery
- in whatever form - as a means of improving your body and/or your state
of mind. 
| |
For Your Body |
|
For Your Face |
|
For Your Skin |
|
For Your Teeth |
|
For Your Eyes |
| | |
...............5B...............
Paper 4
(including
correction work)
For tasks in section A
see solutions below.
Section B: Pop music
and you
1. Bring at least 5 different styles of pop music and explain what makes these styles
special.
2. Talk about your favourite kind of music, singer, group, song, etc.
Correction
work section A
1.
Do you believe in ghosts?
2.
I seem to spend all my money on rent, bills and food.
3.
I prefer tea to coffee.
4.
Southern Rail would like to apologise for the late running of this train.
5.
I’ve never heard of him, is he on the telly?
6.
You look worried. What are you thinking about?
7.
If you borrow money, you must give it back.
8.
Ouch! He has fallen off his motorbike and broken his shoulder.
9.
Would you mind taking off your shoes when you come inside?
10.
When the pilot had a heart attack, the co-pilot took over the controls.
11.
Our plane took off 2 hours late! (= It departed 2 hours late.)
12.
Why do so many men take up golf when they retire? (= They begin to play golf.)
13.
What time do you set off for work in the morning?
14.
He always dreamed of living in the city.
15.
I tried ringing her all morning but I couldn’t get through.
16.
My dad’s been unemployed for 6 months, it’s really getting him down.
17.
Sorry I’m late, I was so tired I just couldn’t get up this morning.
18.
Hmmm, the kids are very quiet, I wonder what they’re getting up to?
19.
I don’t think you really get over the death of a parent.
20.
I find it hard to get by on my salary, I’m always penniless by the end of the month.
21.
Things are very cheap here. You can live on very little money.
22.
His parents don’t approve of what he does.
23.
I’ve never heard of Shakira. Who is she?
24.
Before you go into the house, I must warn you of the dog. a) from b) over c) on d)
Annotations:
8. off – You get on a bike or a horse,
so therefore you fall off.
9. off – You take off what you put
on.
10. ‘Take over’ means take control.
11. The plane ‘took off’ 2 hours
late is correct. It departed or left the ground.
12. ‘Take up’ means to begin
a sport or hobby.
13. ‘Set off for’ means to start
a journey.
14. ‘Dream of doing’ something
is correct.
15. ‘Get through’ means ‘be
connected, usually on the phone.
16. If something ‘gets you down’,
it makes you feel depressed.
17. ‘Get up’ means get out of
bed – be careful, the opposite is not ‘get down’.
18. ‘Get up to something’ means
‘do something you shouldn’t be doing’.
19. To ‘get over something’ means
to recover from either an illness or a death.
20. ‘To get by’ means to survive
on a small amount of money.
Correction work section B
The Caribbean or the West Indies is a group of islands in the
Caribbean
Sea These islands curve southward from the bottom tip of Florida to the Northwest of Venezuela in
South
America. There are at least 7000 islands, islets, reefs and cayes in the region. They are organized into
twenty-five territories including sovereign states, overseas departments and dependencies. The name "West Indies" originates
from Christopher
Columbus’ idea that he had landed in India when he had in fact reached the
Americas. The Caribbean consists of the Greater and Lesser Antilles and is part of North
America. At one time there was a short-lived country called the ‘Federation
of the West Indies’ composed of the English-speaking Caribbean islands of the region. The Caribbean area is
also famous for its sea pirates.
Reggae
[spelling!] is popular Caribbean [spelling!] music of Jamaican origin having elements of calypso and rhythm and blues, characterized
by a strongly accentuated offbeat.
Techno is a style of
dance music characterized by electronic sounds and a high-energy, rhythmic beat.
Punk is rock music with
deliberately offensive lyrics expressing anger and social alienation. Punk is performed without electronic amplification or
modification. [?]
Heavy Metal is very
loud, brash rock music, often with shouted, violent lyrics.
Jazz is a style of music,
native to America, characterized by a strong but flexible rhythmic understructure with solo and ensemble improvisations on
basic tunes and chord patterns and, more recently, a highly sophisticated harmonic idiom.
Classical music is a
term that is often used loosely to include a range of European musical styles going back several hundred years.
The charts [often used
in the plural] is a listing of best-selling recorded music or other items: “A hit single that reached number 3 on the
charts.”
A DJ announces and plays popular recorded
music.
XYZ’s music can be very inspiring.
[=active] I am inspired by XYZ’s music. [=passive]
You are busy [NOT ‘employed’;
beschäftigt] when you are engaged
in activity, as work.
‘To hear’ means to become aware of a sound directly through the auditory sense [hören]. “I heard the burglar break into the house.”
‘To listen’ means to hear with intention [anhören, zuhören]. (“I listened
carefully to the words the teacher said.” “Would you like to listen to the CD before you buy it?”)
Use of present perfect
tense: A popstar who is still in the business has sold so and so many albums because they are still selling and will sell
in the near future.
"Wenn" in German has two meanings that translate
differently in English:
IF is used in sentences in which one thing happens
or is true, depending on whether another thing happens or is true. (Example: I think travel only broadens the mind IF you
are open for new things.)
WHEN is used for talking about the time at which
sg. happens or happened. [Example: WHEN you return from such a journey, you see the world with different eyes.
You could say, "If you return ...", but there is
a completely different meaning to this sentence. It means that there is a likelihood that you will NOT return from this journey.
(... wenn überhaupt ..., falls ...)]

Paper 3
(with solutions)
1. Complete this short article about the ship ‚Mary Rose’.
The correct tense is simple past. Some
verbs are active, and some are passive.
The warship Mary Rose_was built_in the years 1509 – 1510. In 1544 England _started_a
war against France, and in 1545 French ships_were sent_across the Channel towards England. Some
English ships_went out_from Portsmouth to meet them. One of these ships was the Mary Rose. It was
carrying 91 guns and 700 men – twice as many as usual. It_sank_quickly to the bottom of the
sea even before it_was attacked_by the French. About 650 men_died_.
This terrible accident_was seen_by the King himself. The ship_was forgotten_for
hundreds of years. In the 1970s plans_were made_to raise the ship. Thousands of objects _were brought up_from the ship by divers. Then, on October 1, 1982, the Mary Rose_was
lifted_out of the sea. Many people_saw_the raising of the ship on television. Finally the
Mary Rose_was taken_into Portsmouth dock 437 years after she had sunk.
[14 hits possible: >7=5; 7,8=4; 9,10=3; 11,12=2; 13,14=1
2. Put the verbs in brackets in the correct form.
We_will go_to Spain in our next holidays if we can afford it. If we went to
Spain, we_would stay_at a first-class hotel. If Peter passes his exam next week, he_will
go_to university. If you_like_, I’ll get the ticket for you. If he wants to see the
new film, he_will have to go_to the cinema. If he had read the instructions, he_would
not have broken_the machine. S/He_will be_perfect by next year if s/he takes another English
course. If I_were_you, I_would not visit_ him this week. If s/he hadn’t
been ill, s/he_would have been able to take part_in the game. If
you_had not gone_home so early, you wouldn’t have missed the show. S/He would never
be what s/he is now, if s/he_had not_worked hard.
[12 hits possible: >6=5; 6,7=4; 8,9=3; 10,11=2; 12=1]
Correction work of tasks 3 and 4 has been taken from your own contributions.
3.
Write a description of your perfect house or flat:
the style, age, size, colour, etc.;
the kind of area it would be in and why;
the most important features inside and outside the house.
I prefer a house away from the city
because I don't like the traffic and it's too noisy there. My house must be situated
in an area where there is hardly any traffic.
My house should be bigger than any other house in the neighbourhood.
It should have at least [w. o.] six bedrooms.
I would power
my house with solar energy to show my concern for nature.
The furniture should
be made by a carpenter/joiner.
I prefer living
in a safe neighbourhood to living in an area where the action is.
I would be frightened all day long if I lived in a crime-ridden area.
4. Describe your favourite room in your house
or flat.
If you look
under the bed, you will not find much dust there.
If you looked
under my bed, you would find some dirty clothes and a lot of dust there.
The best thing about
my room is that I can have my peace there.

Paper Two
(with solutions)
· Complete this conversation by putting the verbs in brackets into the present perfect or
simple past:
(15 possible hits; 8, 9=4; 10, 11=3;
12, 13=2; 14, 15=1)
RACHEL Hello, Bob.
BOB Hello. I _haven’t
seen_ you for a long time. (not see)
RACHEL I _saw_ you in town two or three
weeks ago (see), but you _didn’t see_ me
(not see). I _was_ on a bus. (be)
BOB Well,
how are things? Are you still living over the shop?
RACHEL No, I _have moved_ now. (move) I _found_ a super flat just before I went on
holiday.
(find)
BOB _Have_ you _passed_ your driving test yet? (pass)
RACHEL Yes, I have. I _passed_ in October.
(pass) I _haven’t bought_ a car yet. (not
buy)
But
what about you, Bob? _Has_ anything exciting _happened_
to you lately? (happen)
BOB No, not really. My mother _hasn’t been_ very well for a few months now. (not be)
RACHEL Oh, dear. I’m sorry
to hear that.
BOB And
my brother is out of work.
RACHEL _Did_ he _leave_ school in the summer, then? (leave)
BOB Yes. He _didn’t
do_ very well in his exams (not do) and he _hasn’t
found_ a job
yet.
(not find)
RACHEL Are you still working at
Scott’s?
BOB Yes. They _have_
just _given_ me a pay rise. (give)
RACHEL Well, that’s one piece of good news.
- Decide the order in which these things happened. Then write TWO sentences using the correct tenses‘after’
and the past perfect tense. (8 possible hits; 5=4; 6=3; 7=2; 8=1)
Example: The prisoner ran across the yard.
He jumped out of the window. He climbed over the wall.
Answer: After the prisoner had jumped out of the window, he ran across the
yard.
After he had run across the yard, he climbed over the wall.
The bank clerk gave the money
to me. _After the bank clerk had looked
at
my check, she counted out the
She looked at my cheque.
money. After she had counted
out
the money she gave it to me._
She counted out the money.
The tourists got out of the coach. _After the tourists had got out of
the
coach, they took photos.
They got back in the coach.
After they had taken photos they
got
back in the coach._
They took photos.
Sue wrote a report on the accident. _After Sue
had gone to the scene
of
the accident, she interviewed
She interviewed the people there. the people there. After she had
interviewed
the people, she wrote a
She went to the scene of the accident. report on the
accident._
The mechanic put a new tyre on. _After the mechanic had taken the
wheel
off the car, he put a new
He put the wheel back on.
tyre on. After he had put a new
tyre
on, he put the wheel back on._
He took the wheel off the car.
- On
a separate sheet of paper write about feelings as a pupil:
“The subject I am/was most interested
in is … because…; I am/was sometimes afraid of … because; I am/was bored when …; Most of our class
really enjoy/ed … because …; The subject I have/had to work hardest at is/was … because …; I like/d/
do/did not like being in this class because … (6 sentences)
From your contributions:
The subject I am most
interested in is biology because you learn about the human body and I want to become a
nurse.
The subject I am most
interested in is history because you learn a lot about people who lived a long time ago.
The subject I was most
interested in was German because we had a very nice and creative teacher.
Most kids in my class enjoy
sports because they like to shape their bodies.
The subject I was most
interested in was Art and Design because I like painting.
The subject I had to work
hardest at was Maths because I missed a lot of classes during the second semester due to illness.
Sometimes I am bored when
we do difficult calculations in Maths.
Most of our class enjoy school
trips because they give you a break from the school routine.
I like being in this class because the
teachers are nice and I have a lot of friends there.
I liked being in this class because I
had a lot of fun with my class mates.
I liked being in this class because we were a strong team and every problem only brought us closer together. | |
Paper
One (with solutions)
1 The Carinthian bus company wants to stop its service
between Himmelberg and Feldkirchen. A bus company manager, Mr Lamprecht, is at a meeting in the village. Report
what is said.
“Lots of people use the buses.” Mrs Krumpl said that
lots of people used the buses.
“How can we get to town?” Mr
Fischer asked
how they could get to town.
“Most people in the village have a car.” Mr Lamprecht replied
that
most people in the village had a car.
“You must be quiet and listen, everyone!” The chairman
told everyone
to be quiet and listen.
“What’s going to happen to the school bus?” Mrs Greiler
asked
what was going to happen to the school bus.
“It will continue to run.” Mr Lamprecht answered that
it would continue to run.
“The village needs a bus service.” Mr Rumpl said that
the village needed a bus service.
“Can you start your own service?” Mr Lamprecht wondered
if the people could start their own service.
“Can everyone please protest to the government.” Mr Hafner
asked everyone
to protest to the government.
On an extra sheet of paper …
2 ... explain in
idiomatically and grammatically correct sentences the following computer words password, chat room, spam mail, palm top
and in addition explain the difference between MP3 and jpeg.
You need a password to access your computer or an account on the Internet.
The chat room is the place in the virtual world where people can communicate
in real time.
Spam mail is unwanted e-mail.
A palm top is a small computer that fits in your hand.
MP3 is a sound file which you can download from the Internet while
jpeg is a common type of graphics file.
An MP3 file stores audio data, while jpeg is one of the formats of
a graphics file.
3 ... write a paragraph of at least ten - idiomatically
and grammatically correct - sentences about your computer literacy, how much time
you spend on the computer, what you use the computer for, why the Internet is convenient, what you don’t like about
it, and how important the computer is in your life.
I'd describe myself as quite computer-literate. I think I'm not too
bad at handling the computer.I spend about two hours a day on the computer. I use it more as a games platform than anything
else. I spend a lot of time surfing the Net. The computer usually helps me with my homework. I hardly ever do my homework
on the computer. I like everything about computers. I think people won't be able to live without computers in the future.
I could just as well live without the computer. What I don't like about the Internet is that people can send you virus-infected
e-mails.
4 ...
write a summary of the poem “New Computer” in idiomatically and grammatically correct English.
The poem "New Computer" brings to mind the fact that a computer, which is state-of-the-art the day
you buy it, is old the next day. The poem exaggerates the point when it mentions the incredible (?) speed and capacity
of the computer, the size of its screen, the number of its disk drives and all the latest gizmos and peripherals it has. | |
.........WPF E/8.........
kjfgn
|